Indy qualifying will be more difficult, may be fastest since 1996

Both five-time IndyCar champion Scott Dixon and Ben Bretzman, Team Penske race engineer for last year’s Indy 500 pole sitter and race winner Simon Pagenaud, believe the extra boost for Indy qualifying this year will more than compensate for additional drag caused by the aeroscreen.

Until 2018, the 2.2-liter turbo V6 regulations were introduced in 2012, IndyCar has run 130kPa [1.3-bar] boost at superspeedways on raceday, 140kPa at short ovals and in Indy 500 qualifying, and 150kPa on road and street courses. Last year, the short oval boost was increased to 150kPa, and so rather than have Indy 500 qualifying as the outlier on 140kPa, IndyCar has simplified engine mapping requirements by increasing Indy’s Fast Friday and qualifying weekend boost to 150kPa.

This has coincided with the aeroscreen’s introduction in 2020 – but Dixon believes the drag induced by the screen has been overemphasized, and that therefore lap times could come down.

“Even though we see the drag numbers are higher, our straightline speeds are the same if not better this year than last year, even in roadcourse trim,” Ganassi’s 2008 Indy winner and three-time 500 polesitter told “Granted, some of the engine numbers – horsepower and torque – will be up a little bit this year, but not by that much, because we’re getting near the end of the cycle for this engine spec. The manufacturers have pretty much got all they can from the 2.2.

Dixon in practice at Texas Motor Speedway.

Photo by: IndyCar

“When we did the Speedway test with the aeroscreen last year, we expected the speeds to be a lot slower than they actually were, so I think the screen may be blocking some of the drag on the rear of the car, so the overall drag figure is not as much as we expected. Pole for Indy last year was right around 230, right? [Pagenaud’s four-lap average was 229.992] Well, I think we should definitely beat that, and I think even our pole run from 2017 with the manufacturer aerokits, which was 232mph – the quickest since Arie [Luyendyk]’s record in ’96 – will be gone.

“You’re adding 40-50hp by going up from 1.4 to 1.5-bar, so it will be a big shift.”

Dixon said this, along with the revised weight distribution, will make greater demands from engineers and drivers in qualifying which, uniquely at Indy, is the average of a four-lap run.

“I think there was only one year, 2015, where we had to run raceday downforce after some of the guys had big crashes, when it was quite easy to manage the tires over the four laps. I imagine it is going to be pretty difficult now if the straightline speeds are going to be up and we’ve got the added weight of the screen.

“But that’s good. Indy qualifying should always be difficult, man, whether you’re fighting for the front row or fighting for the back row. It’s supposed to be tough.”

Bretzman concurred with Dixon’s predicitons.

“I think you’re going to see speeds as fast as last year, if not even faster,” he told, “although it depends on what kind of weather conditions we get. But it’s going to make it difficult to set up the car. I think qualifying will be a lot more difficult than it’s been the last four or five years because of the likely increase in track temperatures to go along with the increased boost to go along with the higher tire energy because of the weight transfer…

“Yeah, it’s going to be one of the trickier qualifying sessions we’ve had there. Is the fix as simple as just putting more downforce in the car? Possibly, but trying to manage where the downforce is on the car for qualifying and if you can get the most consistent four laps out of it – that will be a pretty big deal. We’ll be able to put up a really big lap on Lap 1, but how to manage the four laps is going to be real tricky.

Source: Read Full Article